2012年11月12日 星期一

In Worcester, ballot counting a slow process

It wasn’t until around 2 a.m. yesterday when city election officials were finally able to put a wrap on Tuesday’s election.

By 11 p.m. that night,Manufacturer of electronics products such as solarledlampsry, mobile phone, mp4 player, and digital photo frame. the results from 43 of the city’s 50 precincts had been tabulated and posted at City Hall, but election officials ended up having to wait another three hours before the results from the seven remaining precincts came in and they were able to call it a night.

In addition to the large voter turnout, a major contributing factor to the long night was that the ballot-counting machines at seven precincts broke down during the course of the day, according to City Clerk David J. Rushford.Laser engraving, and lamp, is the practice of using lasers to engrave or mark an object.Automobile liquid crystal sun visor, also known as Automobile liquid goodantiquelamp valve.

He said election officials had to scramble to replace a ballot-counting machine at one precinct after it broke down 15 minutes before the polls were set to close. That required poll workers there to re-run about 3,000 ballot cards through the machine.

In most other instances, the machines’ memory cards had to be replaced because they “fizzled out” from use during the course of the day.

That required election officials to program a new memory card for the machines by loading a template of the ballot into it and then re-running all the ballots that had been previously read and counted.

Given the age of the machines — 22 years old — and the problems encountered with them on Tuesday, election officials feel it may be time to replace them with a new system.

“The Election Commission has been talking about this for a while,” Mr. Rushford said yesterday. “Each time we have had an election, the breakdowns seem a little more frequent. Of course, the turnout has a lot to do with it as well. During the state primary, we didn’t have any problems because we only had to deal with 7,000, 12-inch ballots.

“But on Tuesday, our poll workers had to feed into the machines 130,000, 18-inch ballot cards and that kind of volume took its toll on some of our machines,” he added.

“Because two ballot cards had to be fed into the machines for this election, it was like running two presidential elections in one day. We’re talking about machines that are 22 years old and it’s obvious it’s time to replace them.Our measuring & seamroofclampse provide solutions to unique needs in the wire and fine filament industries.”

The Election Commission has $350,000 in its capital budget for the purchase of a new ballot-counting system and equipment.

Mr. Rushford said the city was one of the first communities in the state to use optical scanning equipment to read and tabulate ballots.

For the machines to be able to read the ballots, voters have to use either a No. 2 pencil or the black marking pen that is available at the polling places.

But many of the more than 4,800 people who voted through absentee ballots did not use the appropriate marking utensil and, as a result, the machines were not able to read those ballots and ended up rejecting them. That meant that poll workers had to count all the rejected ballots by hand, further delaying the delivery of vote totals to City Hall.

“It’s a policy decision that will have to be made by the commission whether to go forward with this,” the clerk said. “Through a little coaxing, oiling and regular maintenance, we’ve been able to keep these machines in use longer than many would have thought. I feel we got a pretty good run out of them.A short video on how to engage the engravingmachines on a roof ladder.”

As for another lesson learned out of Tuesday’s election, Mr. Rushford said the investment made in training poll workers and police officers working the election proved to be money well spent.

沒有留言:

張貼留言