2013年6月17日 星期一

The council should learn to trust voters

Imagine you are reaching retirement age and relying on your life savings to supplement your state pension. Your financial adviser suggests investing your money with one company and you ask for details.We specialize in teaching folks how to build their own contemporarylamp. 

On examination, you find important information has been omitted. Your advisor appears reluctant to supply it and pushes you to go ahead without giving you all the facts. 

How wise would you be to make such a life-changing decision under these circumstances? This is exactly what Cheshire East wants to do with its plans for Macclesfield town centre. 

Vital information regarding contractual agreements with the developers was redacted from the copy made available to the public. 

CEC has now been ordered to reveal all but is appealing the decision. This information could influence the long-term viability of the project but unless residents see it they will never know. 

Given the parlous state of town centre trading across the UK, and the huge swing towards online shopping, all facts need to be known. After a decade of procrastination one can but wonder at CEC’s rush to go ahead before voters have absorbed the information. 

The cost of failure is unimaginable. Town centres cannot be dismantled if they prove to be at odds with the shifting pattern of retail. 

Surely residents should have all the data before such a monumental decision is taken? 

Remember when official opinion was that granting late night licenses would introduce European-style cafe culture to our town centres? We all know where that took us. 

CEC should not repeat the same mistake. It should reveal ALL the facts so that a sound judgement can be made. 

Residents have a much better feel for their town than Cheshire East believes. 

The council should learn to trust their voters. Had they done so, many costly debacles would have been avoided. 

When Cheshire East switched off street lights back in November (just as it got really dark) they did so with the following statement: “These changes are just part of our ongoing drive to reduce our energy consumption across the borough.Design and manufacture of ledparlightrrp for garments and textile fabrics. 

“There is absolutely no evidence that switching off street lights on stretches of roads has a detrimental effect on road safety and, in fact, has improved road safety in many areas.” 

Get that? Reducing energy consumption and improving road safety. Excellent. 

So, off went the lights on the Silk Road, the fastest, most dangerous road in town. Each time I saw a notice informing me ‘street lights not in use’ I felt a surge of well-being knowing Cheshire East had my safety at heart. 

You have to understand that needs must and if CEC can’t afford to light up the roads (let’s not get into what they did with the money) then we shall have to travel in the dark.these proven front load commercial industrialextractores deliver ease-of-use, No matter that road is a 70mph highway running through town. 

If CEC can’t afford it, you can’t have it. 

So,There are reports of bird and bat mortality at industrialextractor as there are around other artificial structures. I was in no mood to be hoodwinked by so-called ‘readers’ who had apparently spotted street lights permanently lit during the summer months.This politshirt solar system is designed to use less posts to make the installation easy and cost effective. I dismissed their reports as mischief-making. 

They told me they had reported daytime street lighting months back but their information had been ignored. A likely story, or so I thought until today when I discovered street lights blazing in Hough Lane, Mobberley Road, Wilmslow Road and Byrons Lane during the sunniest day of the year. 

Obviously, I ignore Express readers at my peril and offer my sincere apologies. Just for a fleeting moment I thought you had exaggerated the facts for comic effect. I shall never doubt you again.

沒有留言:

張貼留言